BELIFT LAB CEO Faces Allegations of False Claims in Exclusive OSEN Interview
At the hearing for the injunction on voting rights against HYBE that Director Min filed last October, she also brought up the similarity of the proposals. However, it has been confirmed that Director Min’s side only used this material during the hearing itself and did not submit the text messages from the anonymous informant who allegedly reported the similarity of the proposals, nor the audio recordings, nor the proposals themselves as evidence. They could not bring themselves to submit as legal evidence the documents that they recently claimed through the media had similar designs, fonts, and document structures. This also demonstrates that Director Min does not consider this matter a core issue.
Min Hee-jin, former CEO of ADOR, submitted testimony from a HYBE whistleblower as evidence to support her claim that ILLIT plagiarized NewJeans.
On this day, the former CEO Min’s side submitted new evidence to support the claim that ILLIT plagiarized NewJeans. During the hearing, the former CEO Min’s side argued, “The creditor (HYBE) denies that ILLIT copied NewJeans, calling it false, but it is a clear fact,” adding, “We received a shocking tip from an internal employee.”
The materials that the former CEO Min’s side submitted to the court that day contained text messages and audio recordings from the informant, a HYBE internal employee affiliated with BELIFT LAB. The internal employee reported that ILLIT’s creative director had requested NewJeans’ proposal from the early stages of conceptualizing ILLIT, and that ILLIT’s proposal was exactly the same as NewJeans’ proposal.
The materials that the former CEO Min submitted to the court that day contain text messages and audio recordings from a HYBE internal informant.
With additional evidence submitted by the former CEO Min’s side to support allegations of ILLIT copying NewJeans, attention is focused on whether the HYBE situation that began last April will enter a new phase.
On this day, the former CEO Min’s side submitted new evidence to support the claim that ILLIT plagiarized NewJeans, drawing attention.
The materials that the former CEO Min’s side submitted to the court that day contain text messages and audio recordings from the informant, a HYBE internal employee. The internal employee reported that ILLIT’s creative director had requested NewJeans’ proposal from the early stages of conceptualizing ILLIT, and that ILLIT’s proposal was exactly the same as NewJeans’ proposal.
🔗 Internal HYBE Tip on ‘NewJeans Proposal Plagiarism’… Min Hee-jin Releases Audio Recordings
Looking at the materials that the former CEO Min’s side submitted to the court that day, they contain text messages and audio recordings from a HYBE internal informant.
🔗 Did the NewJeans Proposal Get Passed to the ILLIT Side?… Min Hee-jin: “I Received an Internal Tip”
Min Hee-jin, former CEO of ADOR, is expected to cause a stir after presenting evidence of ‘ILLIT’s plagiarism of NewJeans’ obtained through an internal tip at the hearing for her CEO reinstatement injunction.
The materials that the former CEO Min’s side submitted to the court contain text messages and audio recordings from a HYBE internal informant. This informant sent a text message to an ADOR representative saying, “I would like to speak with you regarding the similarities between ILLIT and NewJeans.”